The Practicality of Calligraphy Learning Model

Penulis

  • Etika Vestia STAI Darul Qur’an Payakumbuh, Indonesia
  • Moh In’ami IAIN Kudus, Indonesia
  • Ade Setiawan STAI Darul Qur’an Payakumbuh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v19i2.69

Kata Kunci:

Practicality; Calligraphy; Imlaiyyah, learning model, education innovation.

Abstrak

This research aims to develop and test the practicality of an innovative and applicable calligraphy learning model for students at various levels of education. As an art combining aesthetics and technical skills, calligraphy requires an effective learning approach to improve students' understanding and skills. The designed learning model integrates hands-on methods, digital technology, and collaborative approaches to create a more interactive and enjoyable learning experience. The research method used the Research and Development (R&D) approach by adapting the Thiagarajan development model. The research process included needs analysis, model design, validity testing, and practicality testing through limited implementation in the classroom. The instruments used included observation sheets, satisfaction questionnaires, and structured interviews to measure the model's effectiveness and ease of implementation. The results showed that this learning model was considered practical and relevant by teachers and students. The implementation of the model significantly improved students' learning motivation, and understanding of calligraphy concepts, as well as better work. Teachers found the learning structure flexible and adaptable. In conclusion, the calligraphy learning model developed is not only practical but also able to create an innovative learning atmosphere, so it has the potential to be widely adopted. This study recommends further development on a larger scale to test its long-term sustainability and effectiveness.

Referensi

Ahmad, A. A. “Contemporary Islamic Calligraphy Learning.” In 3rd International Conference on Arts and Design Education (ICADE 2020), 232–36. Atlantis Press, 2021.

Alashari, D., & Hamid, M. A. A. “A Systematic Review on Arabic Calligraphy within Islamic Architecture.” Ulum Islamiyyah: Malaysian Journal of Islamic Sciences, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol33no1.263.

Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. “Problem‐Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011, no. 128 (2011): 21–29.

AR, H. S. Seni Kaligrafi Islam. Amzah, 2022.

Blair, S. S. Islamic Calligraphy. Edinburgh University Press, 2020.

Brophy, J. “Teacher Praise: A Functional Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 51, no. 1 (1981): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170249.

Ceballos, M. “Calligraphy as A Sufi Practice.” In Cultural Fusion of Sufi Islam, 149–60. Routledge, 2019.

Chaytor, S., Gottlieb, G., & Reid, G. Regional Policy and R&D: Evidence, Experiments and Expectations. Higher Education Policy Institute, 2021.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, 2016.

Durayhim, A., Al-Ajlan, A., Al-Turaiki, I., & Altwaijry, N. Bin. “Towards Accurate Children’s Arabic Handwriting Recognition via Deep Learning.” Applied Sciences 13, no. 3 (2023): 1692.

Fauzi, M., & Thohir, M. “Pembelajaran Kaligrafi Arab Untuk Meningkatkan Maharah Al-Kitabah.” EL-IBTIKAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 9, no. 2 (2020): 226–40.

Fix, G. M., Kim, B., Ruben, M. A., & McCullough, M. B. “Direct Observation Methods: A Practical Guide for Health Researchers.” PEC Innovation, 1 (2022): 100036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100036.

Gao, S. “Research on the Construction of Calligraphy Education Curriculum System from an Interdisciplinary Perspective.” Journal of Modern Education and Culture, 1, no. 2 (2024).

Kao, H. S., Xu, M., & Kao, T. T. “Calligraphy, Psychology and The Confucian Literati Personality.” Psychology and Developing Societies, 33, no. 1 (2021): 54–72.

Karimkhani, H., Delkhosh Kasmaei, A., & Oladian, M. “Model of Calligraphy Process in The Higher Education System of The Country.” The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 16, no. 3 (2021): 44–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70767/jmec.v1i2.260.

Keller, J. M. “Development and Use of The ARCS Model of Instructional Design.” Journal of Instructional Development 10, no. 3 (1987). https://www.jstor.org/stable/30221294.

Listiawati, N. P., Jura, D., Stevani, M., & Mukhyi, M. A. “Analysis of the Urgency of the Application of Social and Cultural Elements in the Early Childhood Education Sector.” IJD-Demos 4, no. 1 (2022).

Lutfiati, R. R., & Wahyuni, F. “Ta’līm Al-Lugah Al-‘Arabiyyah Bimajāl Mahārah Al-Qirā’Ah Wa Al-Kitābah.” Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education 2, no. 1 (2021): 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v2i1.626.

Mashudi, M., & Azzahro, F. “Contextual Teaching and Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti Di SMP Negeri 2 Jember Dan SMP Negeri 3 JEMBER.” Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan 22, no. 1 (2019): 21–39.

Mushodiq, M. A., Suhono, S., Pratiwi, B. D., & Zuliana, E. “Kristalisasi Ideologi Islam Nusantara Melalui Pembelajaran Dan Pengadaan Kaligrafi (Studi Kasus Di Taman Pendidikan Alquran Al-Mukmin Desa Banjarsari Metro Lampung).” FIKRI: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya 3, no. 1 (2018): 143–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v3i1.281.

Noor, L. S., Nasar, I., Novarlia, I. ., Anieg, M. ., & zulihi, Z. “The Role of Kyai in the Development of Modern Education in Pesantren.” At-Ta’dib, 18, no. 1 (2023): 28–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21111/attadib.v18i1.9911.

Putra, Nusa. Research and Development Penelitian Dan Pengembangan: Suatu Pengantar. Cet.II. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.

Savery, J. R. “Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions.” Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows 9, no. 2 (2015): 5–15.

Seyedi, B. M., Hamidon, N. A., & Ross, L. N. “A Comparative Study of Islamic Calligraphic Painting in MALAYSIA and IRAN: Kajian Perbandingan Antara Seni Lukis Khat Di Malaysia Dan Iran.” Jurnal Pengajian Melayu (JOMAS) 28, no. 1 (2017): 62–84. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JPM/article/view/9618.

Sudarmilah, E., Fatimah, M. L., & Sagirani, T. “Digital Learning Media of Surakarta Hadiningrat Sultanate Museum.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol 13, no. 12 (2020): 4363–67.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.

Taufiqulbiri, A., & Muqowim, M. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Mahasiswa Pmi Pada Mata Kuliah Pengantar Studi Islam.” Vox Edukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 13, no. 1 (2022): 149–58. https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v13i1.1557.

Thiagarajan, S. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. ERIC, 1974.

Thomas, J., Utley, J., Hong, S. Y., Korkmaz, H., & Nugent, G. A Review of The Research. Handbook of Research on STEM Education, 2020.

Telah diserahkan

2026-07-09

Diterima

2026-07-09

Diterbitkan

2026-07-09

Cara Mengutip

Vestia, E., In’ami, M., & Setiawan , A. (2026). The Practicality of Calligraphy Learning Model. At-Ta’dib, 19(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v19i2.69